Should schools teach children about famous historical figures?
A strong Part 3 answer takes a position in the first clause, supports it with one reason and one concrete case, and then names where it stops being true. Around a minute.
The question, as the examiner gives it
Should schools teach children about famous historical figures?
no preparation, about 1 minute to speak
A band 7 to 8 answer
About 124 words at a natural pace — roughly what 60 seconds holds.
Answer it yourself first
Record your own answer first. A model you have read three times comes out with a flattened rhythm, and examiners are trained to hear exactly that. Read it afterwards for the vocabulary and the shape, not to memorise the sentences.Yes, though I would change how it is usually done. Teaching children about individuals is an extremely efficient way to make the past memorable, because a person is easier to hold on to than a process. The problem is that it very quickly becomes a list of admirable people with the difficult parts removed, and children work out by about fourteen that they have been told a simplified story, which damages their trust in the whole subject. What I would want is the complications included from the start. A figure who did something significant and also something indefensible is far more interesting, and much closer to how history actually works. Otherwise you are teaching mythology and calling it history, which serves nobody particularly well.
The words that earn marks
Each one links to how it is pronounced.
- efficient
three syllables with the stress on the second
- memorable
four syllables with the stress on the first
- admirable
stress on the first syllable, often misplaced
- simplified
three syllables, precise about the failure
- complications
four syllables with the stress on the third
- indefensible
five syllables with the stress on the third
- mythology
four syllables with the stress on the second
How a strong answer is built
- 1Agree, then immediately add a condition.
- 2Say why the current approach works.
- 3Explain precisely where it fails.
- 4Propose the alternative and give the cost of not doing it.
Sounds to watch
The ones this answer leans on most.
Straight answers
How long should my answer to “Should schools teach children about famous historical figures?” be?
About 60 seconds. Long enough for the answer plus a reason or an example, short enough that the examiner can get through the rest of the set.
Should I memorise the model answer?
No. Record your own version first, then read the model for the shape and the vocabulary. A memorised answer changes rhythm and pace noticeably, and examiners are trained to hear it — it usually costs more than the better wording gains.
Does sayit score this answer?
It scores what a microphone can observe: an estimate from fluency and pronunciation only — not an official band, and not a mark for vocabulary or grammar.
What the band on your result means
An estimate from fluency and pronunciation only — not an official band, and not a mark for vocabulary or grammar.One question a day until your test
A free account remembers every take, so you watch a trend instead of a single answer, and it picks tomorrow's question for you.